Unity Government Would Hinder Israel's Needed Renewal, Analyst Argues

With current polls indicating no clear majority for either bloc in upcoming elections, the formation of a stable coalition appears unlikely, potentially leading to a unity government. While such governments have historically proven successful, particularly in times of crisis and national need, the current Israeli context demands a different approach, according to an analysis published on September 24, 2026.

Unity governments, like those formed before the Six-Day War and in the 1980s, were instrumental in achieving military victories, withdrawing from Lebanon, stabilizing the economy, and fostering the high-tech industry. However, the article argues that a similar coalition today, even if well-intentioned, would merely delay the necessary reforms and a fresh start Israel requires, especially after the events of October 7.

The current opposition, comprising parties led by figures like Gantz, Liberman, and Lapid, is not presenting a vision for significant change comparable to past transformative leaders. Therefore, the primary goal of the elections should be internal and value-based renewal. The author posits that a change in government is crucial for this renewal, suggesting that even for those who wish to see the current coalition replaced, a continued Likud government might paradoxically serve as a clearer statement of the public's will.

Furthermore, the article contends that Israel needs to overhaul many of its core institutions. A minor shift resulting from the elections would be insufficient given the recent national trauma. The piece emphasizes that effective democracy requires not just the adherence to majority rule and minority rights but also the regular alternation of power, a fundamental advantage of democratic systems. This change in leadership, the author suggests, would also benefit the Likud party itself, which has been in power for nearly 15 years under Benjamin Netanyahu. Only in opposition, the article concludes, can the party develop new leadership and articulate a relevant vision for the 21st century beyond the 'Netanyahu or not Netanyahu' debate.