Former Official Calls for Broad Zionist Government to Unite Israel

Avi Na'im, director-general of the Ministry of Settlement and former head of the Beit Aryeh council, argues that despite divisive public discourse, a broad consensus exists among Israelis on most key issues. He posits that the path to stability lies in forming a wide Zionist government that sets aside some disputes.

Na'im suggests that Israelis largely agree on fundamental principles: a good education system, honest and humble leaders, reduced inequality, affordable housing, lower cost of living, decreased violence and crime, preservation of democratic values and Israel's Jewish character, freedom of lifestyle choice without coercion, a strong economy, security, and equitable burden-sharing, especially for IDF soldiers. Ultimately, he states, the public desires normal, quiet lives and hope.

He questions why the nation is mired in constant, bitter political infighting, which he believes threatens Israel's future. Na'im criticizes leaders for often amplifying divisions for political gain, feeding insatiable coalitions, and forgetting their mandate to serve the nation. He proposes that a broad Zionist government, requiring compromise and setting aside contentious issues, is necessary to overcome the paralysis caused by fragmented political blocs.

Na'im outlines several demands for candidates ahead of elections: universal conscription or national service with exceptions for exceptional Torah scholars, a five-year plan with benchmarks for implementation, and mutual respect. He also calls for term limits for the prime minister (two terms, maximum eight years, not retroactive) and an independent state commission of inquiry into the October 7th failures, with conclusions on personal and public responsibility due within a year. The commission's composition should be determined by a secret Knesset vote.

He believes the leader of the largest party should form the government to prevent political blackmail by small factions, arguing the current system harms governmental stability and public resource allocation. Na'im envisions this leading to two large parties encompassing diverse views, allowing voters clearer choices. He acknowledges that disputes exist but argues they need not define or paralyze the country, advocating for professional mechanisms to find creative solutions and, if necessary, public referendums, always prioritizing Israel's security and existence as a Jewish state.

Finally, Na'im suggests Israel should move beyond a 'Spartan' image, foster global economic and cultural ties, and engage with Muslim nations that have interests in normalizing relations. He concludes that while many may disagree with his proposals, it is crucial for Israelis to demand worthy leadership, clear decision-making, and respect for the voters' will, coupled with the right to non-violent protest, starting with the immediate formation of a broad Zionist government.