Supreme Court Orders Knesset Speaker to Respond on New State Comptroller Vote
The Israeli Supreme Court has ordered Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana to submit his response within one week, by Friday, September 25th, to a petition demanding a repeat vote for the State Comptroller. Justice Ruth Ronen rejected Ohana's request for an extension until October 11th, siding with the petitioner, Yaron Gadot. Gadot argued that the legal issues were straightforward and that Ohana only needed to provide a preliminary response. He also emphasized the public interest in promptly filling the comptroller position, vacant since July, especially during an election period. This comes after a July 2nd Supreme Court ruling that invalidated a previous vote selecting attorney Michael Rabilo and mandated a new election.
Ohana had requested separate legal representation in the petitions against him regarding the failure to elect a new comptroller, citing a divergence in views between himself and Knesset Legal Advisor Adv. Sagit Afik. Afik supports implementing the court's ruling and holding a repeat vote. Consequently, Ohana will be represented by private counsel, while the Knesset will be represented by Afik.
Previously, the Supreme Court had directed the Knesset Speaker and the Knesset itself to state their position on a repeat vote by the upcoming Tuesday. Following this, Ohana, through the Knesset's legal counsel, sought the delay. Knesset's legal representative, Adv. Yitzhak Bart, informed the court of the differing positions and Ohana's need for additional time to secure private counsel and prepare his response. Bart requested an extension until October 11th, which the Knesset reportedly agreed to.
Adv. Afik reportedly believes a repeat vote should be held immediately, in line with the Supreme Court's decision, and is expected to submit her detailed position. She had previously notified Ohana on July 8th that the Knesset should proceed with the repeat vote without delay.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.