IDF Seeks Shin Bet Help Investigating Controversial Documentary 'N.Z.A.'

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has requested assistance from the Shin Bet security agency in investigating a documentary film titled "N.Z.A." (Incidental Damage), which recently won an award at the Venice Film Festival. The IDF is concerned that classified information may have been exposed during the film's production, potentially harming the operations of Unit 8200, a key intelligence unit. The Shin Bet has not yet become involved, stating they await a formal request following decisions by the Military Advocate General, Itai Ofir, and Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara.

Concerns within the IDF center on whether classified or restricted information was used and the identities of the interviewees, particularly if any are currently serving soldiers or reservists. The IDF is examining the possibility of taking action against active personnel if they are found to have transferred prohibited information. Unit 8200 is a focal point due to its extensive ties with international intelligence agencies and the potential damage to its activities and personnel.

The Military Advocate General's office has indicated that there is currently no legal basis for criminal prosecution unless field security offenses or the exposure of secrets are proven. However, disciplinary measures could be considered if military orders were violated. IDF Chief of Staff Aviv Kochavi has instructed intelligence and legal branches to expedite the identification of interviewees to determine their service status.

In parallel, Minister of Culture and Sport Miki Zohar has asked the head of the Shin Bet to investigate the source of the materials used by the filmmakers, Yuval Avraham and Rachel Shore, and whether enemy elements like Hamas were involved. Zohar is considering potential measures, including revoking the filmmakers' citizenship.

There is also internal criticism within the IDF regarding the senior command's handling of the affair, with some arguing that the Chief of Staff's strong public statements before viewing the film were premature and could further erode public trust in the military.