NYT Op-Ed by Gazan Native Calls for Hamas Ouster, Shocks Western Left
A recent opinion piece in The New York Times, penned by a Gazan native, has generated significant attention for its direct criticism of Hamas and its call for the group's removal from power. The author, Ahmed Fouad Al-Khatib, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, argues that Hamas is the primary enemy of Gaza's residents and that the territory cannot recover under its rule. The article, titled "To Rebuild Gaza, Hamas Must Go," challenges the narrative often promoted by Western activists who romanticize Hamas as a "liberation movement."
Al-Khatib, who grew up in Gaza during the early 2000s when the region had developing industries and prospects for statehood, recounts how Hamas's rise to power destroyed these hopes. He describes the group as having established a "totalitarian system of terror," characterized by the brutal suppression of political opponents, torture, public executions, pervasive surveillance through a secret police network, and a shadow economy fueled by smuggling, Iranian subsidies, and the embezzlement of humanitarian aid.
The author specifically criticizes Western pro-Palestinian activists, accusing them of romanticizing a group that has held millions hostage for decades. He points out that these activists often ignore or downplay the internal protests by Gazans against Hamas rule, which he states have been violently suppressed. Al-Khatib asserts that genuine support for Palestinians must begin with an unequivocal condemnation of terrorists, not with justifications for their actions.
Al-Khatib outlines a three-step plan for Gaza's revival: the complete removal of Hamas from power without any political comeback, the disarmament of its militant wings and the dismantling of its military infrastructure, and a deep de-radicalization of civil society institutions, including schools, mosques, and media. He concludes that Gaza has no future while Hamas holds its population hostage to its "nihilistic agenda."
The publication of such a critical piece in The New York Times, a newspaper often seen as critical of Israeli policy, is considered by observers to be a significant shift in the media's coverage of the Middle East crisis. The New York Post highlighted the article's impact in dismantling common myths held by the Western left.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.