Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Ask Duki without the monthly limit — answers from the coverage, with sources
  • Save articles, synced between the web and the app
  • Every Not Everywhere story, no daily limit
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

to move · to open · esc to close

Live Terminal

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Ask Duki without the monthly limit — answers from the coverage, with sources
  • Save articles, synced between the web and the app
  • Every Not Everywhere story, no daily limit
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Compare full coverage across 2 outlets

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to save this article and find it on your phone.

or use an email code

By עו"ד נתי אוסטר | פסקדיןOngoing story · 2 updates
Politics13:58 · 5h ago

Court Invalidates Will, Citing Exploitation of Elderly Woman

YnetCenter
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
The story · English

A family court in Tel Aviv has invalidated the second will of a childless elderly woman, ruling that it was drafted under undue influence by her nephews who were caring for her. The judge, Gali Ron, found significant flaws in the will and concluded that the deceased had been misled into believing her half-brother had stolen her money, leaving her destitute.

The woman, a widow without children, had initially drafted a will in 2009, stipulating that her apartment be divided among four heirs: her half-brother, two nephews, and another individual. In 2018, her half-brother fell into depression, and the responsibility for her care shifted to her nephews. Approximately a year later, in July 2019, she executed a second will, disinheriting the half-brother and leaving the vast majority of her estate, excluding $15,000, to the two nephews.

Following the woman's death in October 2020, the disinherited half-brother contested the second will, alleging that the nephews had unduly influenced her, "incited her against him, and falsely accused him of stealing her money, exploiting her weakened elderly state." He urged the court to uphold the first will.

The nephews, however, maintained that the second will accurately reflected their aunt's wishes, stating she was angry at her brother for mismanaging her finances and disappearing from her life. They emphasized their role as her family, celebrating holidays with her and attending to her needs.

Judge Ron was unconvinced, determining that the nephews had exploited their caregiving role and the woman's physical frailty and dependence to secure the majority of her inheritance. The court noted that the nephews had already received funds from the woman's account, with 241,000 shekels transferred to them in August 2017, before they began providing care, under suspicious and unexplained circumstances.

Further procedural irregularities included the woman not signing the will in the presence of two witnesses simultaneously, and doubts about whether the will was read to her in Hebrew or her native Persian. One witness explicitly stated the will was not read to the deceased before signing. Consequently, the court invalidated the second will, reinstated the first, and ordered the nephews to pay 59,000 shekels in legal costs.

Read the original at Ynet
Full coverage · 2 outlets
First: Ynet · 5h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 1Unrated 1
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the live terminal