Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Every Not Everywhere story, no daily limit
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

to move · to open · esc to close

Live Terminal
By כיכר השבת, דניאל הרץOngoing story · 2 updates
General03:55 · 2h ago

Israeli Court Orders Channel 14 and Journalist to Pay $27,000 for Defamation

Kikar HaShabbatReligious
Translated & summarized from Kikar HaShabbat by baba
The story · English

A district court in Rehovot has ordered Israeli television channel Channel 14 and journalist Nati Langerman to pay 100,000 shekels (approximately $27,000) in damages for defamation. The ruling, issued by Judge Israel Pat, found that a series of publications made by Langerman on Channel 14 and other platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic were negligent and unsubstantiated.

The case involved serious allegations made by Langerman against Yosefa Barak, a well-known communications consultant, during a heated public debate surrounding vaccination policies and the Ministry of Health. The accusations included claims of deliberately severing family ties and alleged threats against senior judges.

Channel 14 and Langerman argued that their publications were protected under the law of reasonableness and were intended as a response to Barak's public activism, asserting they were part of a legitimate public discussion on a sensitive issue.

However, Judge Pat distinguished between the various publications. While some claims related to the harassment of the Aleray Price family were supported by previous judicial decisions, the other accusations, particularly those concerning threats to the judiciary, completely collapsed due to a lack of factual basis. The court determined that the defendants failed to prove their serious accusations and that their conduct did not meet the standards of responsible journalism.

Considering the removal of the publications and their reach, the court ordered the channel and the journalist to pay the total compensation. This verdict is seen as a significant precedent regarding media accountability and the boundaries of legitimate public criticism, joining a series of recent rulings emphasizing the need for media outlets to adhere to strict standards before publishing severe accusations that can damage reputations.

Read the original at Kikar HaShabbat
Full coverage · 1 outlets
First: Kikar HaShabbat · 2h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Who covered this

1 right

  • Haredi press1 / 3
Open the live terminal