Burundi, Uganda Near Joining Gaza International Force
Burundi and Uganda are reportedly close to joining a planned international stabilization force for Gaza, a component of a post-war plan proposed by former U.S. President Donald Trump. The two African nations could contribute approximately 2,000 soldiers to the force. Officers from both countries visited Gaza last month, including the Rafah area, to assess readiness for participation.
Diplomatic sources indicate Burundi has made a preliminary decision to send between 500 and 800 soldiers, while Uganda may deploy around 1,200 troops in stages. Burundi's participation still requires formal arrangements, whereas Uganda's parliament approved troop deployment for the international force in August. The Ugandan military confirmed parliamentary approval for the mission, responding to a U.S. request.
Both Burundi and Uganda possess extensive experience in peacekeeping operations, notably in Somalia as part of international and African missions against Al-Shabaab. Experts suggest this experience, coupled with their willingness to sustain casualties, makes them suitable candidates for the Gaza force. Burundian sources also point to potential economic benefits, including funding and compensation, alongside opportunities for enhanced cooperation with the U.S. and improved international standing. Burundi also anticipates expanding collaboration with Israel in sectors like agriculture, health, technology, and security.
The planned International Stabilization Force (ISF) for Gaza was approved by the UN Security Council as part of Trump's initiative. Its mandate includes aiding security stabilization, monitoring ceasefires, supporting Palestinian police training, protecting civilians and humanitarian corridors, and contributing to disarmament efforts. The original plan envisioned a force of 20,000 soldiers led by U.S. General Jasper Jeffers, but its formation has faced delays and difficulties in securing troop contributions. The deployment of the ISF remains contingent on agreements regarding Israeli withdrawal, Hamas disarmament, and the governance of Gaza.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.