Politics06:24 · 1h ago

Palestinian Elections: A Path to Change or Stagnation?

Arab48
Translated & summarized from Arab48 by baba
The story · English

The Palestinian people urgently need effective new national leadership to navigate complex challenges and alleged conspiracies, including attempts at a new Nakba and ethnic cleansing. The article argues that elections for the Legislative Council, which is part of the Palestine National Council (PNC), are crucial and should be coupled with elections for the remaining PNC members both domestically and abroad. These broader elections have been demanded for over 20 years and should not be replaced by appointments, which would lead to stagnation and a failure to achieve national unity or address challenges.

If conducted fairly and democratically, Palestinian elections could achieve three key goals. First, they could restore the fractured democratic structure by separating legislative, judicial, and executive powers, replacing autocratic rule and decrees. This would foster genuine democratic pluralism, empower youth, and allow Palestinians everywhere to elect their representatives and political vision, rather than relying on outdated quota systems or appointments.

Second, elections could end internal division and unify the national structure through democratically elected bodies that include everyone. This would restore credibility and strength to Palestinian institutions and thwart plots to separate Gaza from the West Bank or impose foreign sovereignty over the Gaza Strip. Third, democratic elections, encompassing the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, could serve as a form of civil resistance against Israeli settlement, annexation, and settler terrorism. They would affirm the right to self-determination and build independent national institutions resistant to occupation measures and foreign interference aimed at dismantling the Palestinian national struggle or excluding certain Palestinian forces from the political arena.

Despite potential external attempts to influence candidacies and election outcomes, all Palestinian factions have insisted on participating, with numerous initiatives forming unified lists to achieve real change and restore the democratic right to elect leaders, a right denied for over two decades. Elections, held with a focus on national unity and respect for pluralism and free expression, can end the current division. However, this requires avoiding sharp polarization and building alliances on clear principles and political foundations, not just factional interests.

Significant risks threaten the elections, primarily opposition from Israel and its allies, who allegedly seek to thwart them as part of plans to liquidate the Palestinian cause and separate Gaza from the West Bank. Israel might obstruct the elections logistically or by escalating security tensions. The Central Elections Commission must preemptively develop alternatives to ensure the process's integrity and fairness, with cooperation from all participating parties to overcome artificial obstacles. Regardless of difficulties, fundamental principles must be upheld: rejecting appointments over elections, viewing obstacles as motivation to proceed even if delayed, and including elections for the Legislative Council, PNC, and the presidency. The article concludes that political systems and institutions lose vitality and become stagnant without regular renewal through timely elections, emphasizing that elections are a natural right of the Palestinian people, not a favor from external parties.

Read the original at Arab48
Open the live terminal