Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Every Not Everywhere story, no daily limit
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

to move · to open · esc to close

Live Terminal
By ענת גלעד
Politics05:10 · Sep 5

Navigating Divorce in Israel: Rabbinical Court vs. Family Court

Bizportal
Translated & summarized from Bizportal by baba
The story · English

In Israel, Jewish couples seeking divorce must ultimately obtain a "get" (religious writ of divorce) from a rabbinical court, even if other aspects of their separation, such as property division and child custody, have been settled in family court. This dual system often leads to confusion regarding jurisdiction, as both the rabbinical court and the family court can handle various issues surrounding a divorce, including financial settlements and child arrangements.

The choice of which court to initiate proceedings in can become a point of contention itself, leading to "races for jurisdiction" where one party attempts to file first to gain an advantage. Historically, a common perception was that men benefited from initiating proceedings in rabbinical courts, while women had an advantage in family courts. However, this is an oversimplification, as the optimal choice depends heavily on the specific circumstances, the nature of the dispute, and the applicable laws.

Recent legal developments, such as a High Court ruling and subsequent Knesset legislation regarding child support (alimony), highlight the evolving nature of these jurisdictions. In February 2025, the High Court limited the rabbinical courts' authority over child support in divorce cases, but the Knesset quickly passed a two-year temporary order allowing them to continue hearing these matters, which can involve substantial sums.

The cost of divorce is not solely determined by court fees but significantly by legal representation and the duration of proceedings. Disputes over jurisdiction alone can incur substantial legal expenses before the main issues are even addressed. While there are differences in legal procedures and substantive law between the two court systems, both operate within the framework of Israeli law. The "ketubah" (marriage contract) is another area where differences are pronounced, with rabbinical courts handling claims related to its value, which can amount to significant sums and has recently seen new regulations on the maximum amounts that can be inscribed.

Ultimately, the most cost-effective approach to divorce is often reaching an agreement outside of court. Couples who agree on all terms can have their settlement approved by either the family court or, in some cases, the rabbinical court, streamlining the process and avoiding costly jurisdictional battles. Even when aiming for an agreement, early legal consultation is advised to understand the implications of each step.

Read the original at Bizportal

Who covered this

One newsroom has this

  • Business press1 / 5
Open the live terminal