General09:38 · 8h ago

Be'er Sheva Court Hears Dispute Between Barber Chain Owner and Ben-Gurion University Over Rental Agreement

YnetCenter
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
The story · English

A commercial dispute is currently underway at the Be'er Sheva Magistrate's Court between the owner of the "BARBER 7" chain and Ben-Gurion University. The barber claims the university caused delays and obstacles in opening a new flagship salon at the student village, demanding approximately 301,000 shekels in damages. In response, the university filed a counterclaim for 500,000 shekels.

The conflict began after both parties signed a lease in October 2024 for a 58-square-meter retail space. The barber alleges he was initially told the property would be delivered finished, but later was informed it would be handed over as a shell requiring him to fund renovations. The university denies this, stating the condition was clearly communicated as a shell before signing.

The barber, represented by attorneys Gefen Friedman and Tamir Dahan, claims the university delayed handing over the property due to a dispute over a security deposit, ultimately demanding 54,967 shekels beyond the lease terms. Upon attempting renovations, he found essential infrastructure like water, electricity, and sewage missing. Conflicting instructions from university representatives, especially regarding flooring materials, further complicated the process. After investing over 156,000 shekels and suffering losses including a canceled training course and higher rent at a previous location, the barber canceled the lease.

Ben-Gurion University, represented by attorneys Guy Leichter and Dana Mahajna, presents a contrasting narrative. They assert the tenant failed to provide required bank guarantees, insurance, plans, and approvals, began unauthorized work, refused to fix deficiencies, and abandoned the site in an unusable state. The university claims damages totaling about 920,000 shekels, including lost rental income and compensation, and after deducting the deposit, seeks 500,000 shekels in court.

The case highlights a significant commercial dispute involving lease terms, property conditions, and responsibilities for renovations between a university and a local business owner.

Read the original at Ynet
Open the live terminal