Compare full coverage across 4 outlets
Security07:33 · 1h ago

Australian Court Allows Viral Video as Evidence in Antisemitism Case Against Sydney Hospital Workers

Behadrei HaredimReligious
Translated & summarized from Behadrei Haredim by baba
The story · English

The New South Wales Court of Appeal in Australia has ruled that a viral video showing two former hospital workers in Sydney making alleged threats against Israelis will be admitted as evidence in their upcoming trial. This decision overturned a previous ruling by the Sydney District Court. The trial is scheduled to begin at the end of the month.

The video, recorded last year by Israeli content creator Max Waiper, captures siblings Ahmed "Rashad" Nadir and Sarah Abu Labda, both healthcare professionals at Bankstown Hospital in Sydney, engaging in a conversation with Waiper. During the exchange, Nadir expressed hostility towards Israelis, saying, "It annoys me so much that you are Israeli," and threatened that Waiper would "be killed and go to hell, Inshallah." Abu Labda also made threatening remarks, stating, "This is Palestine's country, not yours," and later declared she would not treat Israelis and would "kill them." Both were suspended from their jobs for two years following the video's release.

A key issue in the appeal was the legal jurisdiction of the recording. The prosecution argued the video was recorded in Israel, where Waiper was located during the call, and thus did not violate New South Wales law. The defense countered that part of the recording occurred in Australia, as the hospital microphone in Bankstown captured the siblings' voices. Their lawyer, Peter Lang, stated the conversation took place in both countries.

The prosecution emphasized that without the full, unedited video, it would be difficult for jurors to grasp the full context, tone, facial expressions, and gestures of the defendants. They argued that excluding the video would significantly weaken their case. The court has currently imposed a publication ban on the detailed reasoning behind its decision, pending review by the parties involved.

Read the original at Behadrei Haredim
Full coverage · 4 outlets
50% centerFirst: Ynet · 4h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 2Right 2
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the live terminal