Gilad Erdan Sets Red Line Against Coalition With Democrats in Emerging Third Right-Wing Bloc
With 88 days remaining until Israel's elections, the formation of a new right-wing political bloc, dubbed the "third bloc," is intensifying. Gilad Erdan, a key figure in this effort, has established a firm red line for potential partners: an outright rejection of any government coalition involving the Democratic Party. This stance highlights growing divisions within the bloc and complicates potential alliances.
Erdan is actively working behind the scenes to build a new political framework, engaging in advanced talks with former Minister Yuli Edelstein, former Beit Shemesh Mayor Aliza Bloch, and businessman Hazi Nehama, who confirmed ongoing discussions. Additional contacts with other political figures and groups are also underway. Erdan’s refusal to consider any partnership with the Democrats, whether as external support or sharing key ministerial roles, restricts his coalition options and limits possible mergers within the third bloc.
Meanwhile, on Wednesday, Hili Tropper and Yoaz Hendel plan to launch the "Beit HaTzionim" (House of Zionists) campaign. They aim to attract more members from the religious Zionist community, which they see as their main growth base. Their goal is to establish a right-wing, state-oriented party that appeals to voters dissatisfied with existing parties.
As the election approaches, multiple political initiatives are competing within the crowded right-wing space. Despite surface similarities, these efforts represent two distinct political models. Tropper and Hendel seek broader post-election flexibility, while Erdan differentiates himself with a clear veto against any left-wing coalition. This stance may attract right-wing voters opposed to the current government but unwilling to join a coalition with the Democrats. However, it could also hinder Erdan’s ability to form a government alternative, a role centrist parties aspire to fill.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.