US Considers Two-Week Airstrike Campaign Against Iran Amid Rising Tensions
In a secret emergency meeting aboard Air Force One, President Donald Trump convened top US military leaders to discuss a decisive response to escalating threats from Iran. The meeting took place shortly after the return of four American soldiers killed in conflict with Iran, amid growing concerns over Tehran's missile capabilities and recent attacks on US forces in Jordan.
Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of US Central Command, advocated for an intensive two-week airstrike campaign aimed at crippling Iran's missile infrastructure to reduce reliance on missile defense systems. In contrast, Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Kain urged caution, highlighting the risks of a prolonged conflict and the depletion of US interceptor missile stockpiles needed for other global hotspots like China, North Korea, and Russia.
Despite internal disagreements, the Trump administration appears determined to respond forcefully. Following a sudden missile barrage from Tehran that resulted in American casualties, US forces launched extensive retaliatory strikes Wednesday night, described as a strong response by Central Command. However, some experts warn that airstrikes alone may not fully neutralize Iran's underground missile capabilities.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Trump in Washington, with officials indicating that Israeli forces could participate in a broader US military operation if it proceeds. Intelligence assessments estimate that approximately 21 to 22 percent of Iran's missile arsenal remains intact after previous strikes, underscoring the complexity of the campaign.
The situation remains fluid as the US weighs military action against diplomatic options, with Trump emphasizing a readiness to "hit them hard" while leaving a narrow opening for continued talks. The coming days will be critical in determining the scope and duration of US engagement in the region.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
