Benny Gantz Acknowledges Netanyahu's Political Edge and Calls for Broad Unity Government
Blue and White party leader Benny Gantz spoke at Channel 14's Security Conference on October 31, addressing his complex relationship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the ongoing military campaign. Gantz praised Netanyahu as a superior politician and acknowledged his effective military leadership during the war. He described his own role as providing political backing and resources rather than approving operational plans.
Reflecting on the October 7 massacre, Gantz accepted personal responsibility, stating he was part of the system that failed over seven years and called for a state commission of inquiry. He described the attack as a "very serious failure" and urged Israel to adopt a proactive security doctrine, emphasizing the need to initiate military operations rather than merely respond. Gantz outlined his "10 in the Fifth" plan to prevent terrorist armies from forming within 10 kilometers of Israel's borders, especially near Gaza.
Regarding his resignation from the government and security cabinet, Gantz denied delaying the military campaign, asserting he advocated for advancing into Rafah and Khan Yunis before Lebanon, contrary to Netanyahu's claims. He said his departure followed weeks of unsuccessful negotiations over six strategic points with Netanyahu, who he accused of constant pressure.
On National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, Gantz acknowledged some improvements in prison system management but criticized his broader performance. He opposed serving alongside Ben-Gvir in a future government due to serious past actions, while describing the situation with Minister Bezalel Smotrich as more complex.
Concluding, Gantz emphasized his vision for a broad unity government crossing political blocs, rejecting narrow coalitions. He declared his commitment to saving Israel and stated, "I do not hate anyone there, and I want to save the country."
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.