Knesset Members Clash in Heated Debate Over Election Candidacy Disqualifications
Translated & summarized from Ice by baba
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Supreme Court hears case to disqualify Balad party's Sami Abu Shehadeh from elections.
- Abu Shehadeh called Oct. 7 attack an 'important historical event'.
- MKs Ahmad Tibi and Tali Gottlieb engaged in a heated argument.
- Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir joined the confrontation between the MKs.
- Abu Shehadeh later expressed regret for his article.
Israel's Supreme Court began deliberations on Thursday regarding the disqualification of Sami Abu Shehadeh, chairman of the Balad party, from running in the 26th Knesset elections. Further discussions are scheduled for later the same day concerning the disqualification of Ofer Cassif from the Hadash party, the Ra'am party, and the Joint List. The decision to consider Abu Shehadeh's disqualification stemmed from an article he published after the October 7th Hamas attack, in which he described the surprise assault as an "important historical event."
Following the initial hearing on Abu Shehadeh's candidacy, a heated exchange erupted between Members of Knesset Ahmad Tibi and Tali Gottlieb. Gottlieb questioned Tibi about his recognition of a Jewish state, to which Tibi responded by shouting, "Get away from here, I recognize your need for a psychiatrist. Go away. Let him be a Jewish psychiatrist, I don't care." When Gottlieb repeatedly pressed for a direct answer, Tibi refused to respond substantively, with Gottlieb accusing him of being "a supporter of terrorism who works against us."
The debate intensified when Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir, chairman of the Otzma Yehudit party, joined the confrontation. Tibi shouted at Ben-Gvir, "Every dog has its day, and this dog is you. Wait until October 27th."
The court is currently examining the disqualification of Sami Abu Shehadeh from the Balad party. The Attorney General, Gali Baharav-Miara, along with other legal officials, supported Abu Shehadeh's disqualification, with arguments presented in the Supreme Court stating that his article expressed support for terrorism. Subsequently, Abu Shehadeh expressed regret over the article, calling it "unsuccessful" in hindsight and stating that he would not have published it had he been aware of the full extent of the atrocities at the time of its writing.
Read the original at Ice