Balad Party Chair Denies Extremist Remarks Before Supreme Court
Translated & summarized from Now 14 by baba
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Balad chairman Sami Abu Shehadeh argued against his Knesset disqualification.
- He denied praising the October 7th Hamas attack.
- Abu Shehadeh claimed his controversial article did not represent him.
- He pledged to uphold Israeli law and highlighted social work.
- Evidence against him was presented to the Supreme Court.
Sami Abu Shehadeh, chairman of the Balad party, appeared before an expanded panel of nine Supreme Court justices on Thursday to argue against his disqualification from running in the upcoming Knesset elections. Abu Shehadeh faces potential disqualification due to his support for the Hamas attack on October 7th.
During the hearing, Abu Shehadeh attempted to distance himself from his past statements, including an article published on October 8th, 2023, where he described the attack as a "historically important event militarily, politically, and strategically." He claimed the article's style did not represent him and that he is against violence. He also pledged to abide by Israeli law and highlighted his work on behalf of people with disabilities and other social causes to appeal to the judges.
However, his attempts at self-portrayal as a moderate were met with skepticism. Interjections from the audience questioned his stance on violence, to which Abu Shehadeh responded by denying ever calling for or supporting violence. He repeatedly complained about disruptions in the courtroom, stating he could not concentrate.
The court also addressed his article, where he allegedly downplayed the atrocities of October 7th. Abu Shehadeh reiterated his claim that the article's style was not representative of him and that he disagreed with aspects of it. He also mentioned his efforts to promote peace based on justice, freedom, and equality, and his commitment to representing both Jewish and Arab citizens who believe in these principles.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence against Abu Shehadeh, including his article and other statements, which led the Attorney General to support his disqualification. His defense sought to portray him as a peace-seeking parliamentarian, contrasting with the evidence presented.
Read the original at Now 14