Sign in to baba News

The Desk, the news read to you every hour, is part of News Plus.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer: who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • Every newsroom clip, from every platform
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome, one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer: who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • Every newsroom clip, from every platform
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer: who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • Every newsroom clip, from every platform
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Ongoing Story· Today

IDF Refutes Claims in Anti-Israel Film 'Collateral Damage'

15 developments

IDF Rejects 'Distorted' Gaza Collateral Damage Film

Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · Sole source

Originalכמעט חודש אחרי הסערה, צה"ל מגיב על הסרט נז"א: "תמונה מעוותת ומניפולטיבית"

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • IDF calls Gaza collateral damage film 'distorted' and 'manipulative'.
  • Military denies AI independently selects targets for attack.
  • IDF insists it never planned attacks expected to kill 500 civilians.
  • The army refutes claims of automatic approval for attacks endangering civilians.
  • Film accused of factual errors and omitting context on IDF operations.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has issued a strong rebuttal to the documentary film 'Collateral Damage' (Nez'a), released nearly a month ago, calling it a "distorted, misleading, and unrealistic picture" of its operations in Gaza. The military asserts that the film's narrative is based on significant factual errors stemming from a misrepresented and manipulative presentation.

In its detailed response, the IDF addressed several key claims made in the film. It emphasized that IDF directives clearly distinguish between combatants and uninvolved civilians in Gaza, prohibiting attacks on civilians and mandating the minimization of harm to them. The military denied ever planning or executing an attack expected to kill 500 civilians, or any number close to that, and stated that no such claim has ever been seriously made against the IDF. The IDF also clarified that artificial intelligence has never independently selected targets for attack; this process is solely conducted by qualified intelligence officers, relevant professionals, and operational commanders.

Furthermore, the IDF refuted the film's assertion that automatic approval is given for attacks on targets endangering a predetermined number of civilians, such as 20 for a junior operative or 200 for a senior commander. The military explained that 'Lavender,' a system mentioned in the film, is a database assisting intelligence researchers, not an approved target list. The IDF also stated that evacuation warnings do not grant permission to disregard the presence of civilians remaining in an area during an attack.

Concluding its points, the IDF affirmed that it does not ignore the consequences of its attacks but actively investigates them, including unintentional harm to civilians, contrary to the film's claims. These investigations lead to inquiries into hundreds of incidents and inform lessons learned. The IDF accused the filmmakers of distorting reality and manipulating interviews, suggesting that proper fact-checking and source verification would have revealed the film's inaccuracies. The military also criticized the filmmakers for not presenting the full scope of target planning, which involves legal advisors and commanders, and for omitting crucial context about the war, Hamas's tactics, and the IDF's extensive efforts to minimize civilian casualties.

The film, which features testimonies from 24 soldiers allegedly from Unit 8200, discusses the IDF's actions during the war, including claims of involvement in "war crimes and genocide" and descriptions of collateral damage policies, shelling, and assassinations. A central theme is the alleged use of AI in recommending targets based on phone surveillance, even when civilian family members were expected to be killed.

Read the original at Ynet
YnetCentre · Rishon LeZion

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

You’ve used your five follows

News Plus follows as many newsrooms, topics and people as you like.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • Every newsroom clip, from every platform
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal
See News Plus

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

You’ve used your five follows

News Plus follows as many newsrooms, topics and people as you like.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • Every newsroom clip, from every platform
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal
See News Plus

Mentioned

Open the live terminal