IDF Denies Allegations in 'Nez'a' Film, Calls Portrayal Distorted
Translated & summarized from Abu Ali Express by baba
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- IDF calls film 'Nez'a' distorted and misleading.
- IDF denies planning attacks with expected 500 civilian deaths.
- AI does not independently select targets, says IDF.
- IDF refutes claims on automatic attack approvals.
- IDF states 'Lavender' is an intelligence aid, not target list.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has issued a strong rebuttal to a film titled 'Nez'a,' asserting that it presents a distorted, misleading, and unrealistic depiction of IDF target planning and attack processes.
The IDF stated that the film's narrative is based on significant factual errors stemming from a distorted and manipulative presentation. Specifically, the IDF refuted several key claims made in the film. It emphasized that IDF regulations clearly distinguish between terrorists and uninvolved civilians in Gaza, with attack processes strictly adhering to this distinction and prohibiting targeting civilians while mandating efforts to minimize civilian harm.
The military also denied ever planning, approving, or executing an attack in Gaza where the deaths of 500 civilians or a similar number were anticipated, nor has the IDF ever been credibly accused of causing such a scale of civilian casualties. Furthermore, the IDF clarified that artificial intelligence has never independently selected targets; this process is solely handled by qualified intelligence officers, with planning by relevant professionals and final decisions made by operational commanders.
The IDF also refuted claims about automatic approval for attacks based on predetermined civilian casualty thresholds, stating that such rules do not exist. The film's assertion that 'Lavender,' an intelligence database, is a list of approved targets was also denied, with the IDF explaining it is a tool to assist intelligence analysts. The military also stated that evacuation warnings do not permit ignoring the presence of civilians who remain in an area, and that the IDF investigates the outcomes of its strikes, including unintentional civilian harm, to learn lessons, contrary to the film's claims.
Read the original at Abu Ali Express