Sign in to baba News

The Desk, the news read to you every hour, is part of News Plus.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Politics12:43 · 54m ago

Israel's Supreme Court Rejects Further Review of "Trapped Profits" Tax Law

By ליטל דוברוביצקי
Translated & summarized from Calcalist by baba
The story · English

The President of Israel's Supreme Court, Justice Yitzhak Amit, has rejected a request for an additional hearing on the "trapped profits" tax law. The law, which was approved in May and takes effect January 1, 2025, targets "minority companies," defined as those controlled by up to five individuals and not publicly traded. It introduces two main provisions: expanding cases where a minority company's income is attributed to its individual owners, and imposing a new 2% tax on profits the company chooses not to distribute as dividends.

The legislation aims to combat the use of "wallet companies" that exploit a two-stage corporate tax system to defer tax payments, often for purposes other than intended. Following the law's enactment, several companies argued it was unjust, infringing on their property rights and unfairly impacting legitimate businesses that retained funds for business reasons, a phenomenon termed "incidental damage."

Two petitions challenging the law's constitutionality were filed with the Supreme Court. In May, the court unanimously upheld the law, stating its benefits were clear and immediate, while the potential harm to non-"wallet" companies was not severe or definitively quantifiable. The petitioners, represented by the Rubinstein Group, sought an additional hearing to overturn the ruling.

Justice Amit ruled that additional hearings are an exceptional procedure, not a further appeal, and the request did not meet the necessary criteria. He clarified that a law being constitutional does not mean it doesn't impact rights, but rather that the impact serves a legitimate purpose and is proportionate. The Rubinstein Group's attorney expressed regret over the decision, stating they would continue to seek remedies for the "distortion" caused by the law, which they believe unfairly harms businesses.

Read the original at Calcalist

Keep up with

CalcalistBusiness · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

You’ve used your five follows

News Plus follows as many newsrooms, topics and people as you like.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal
See News Plus

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

You’ve used your five follows

News Plus follows as many newsrooms, topics and people as you like.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal
See News Plus
Mentioned
People
Isaac Amit
Open the live terminal