Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the monthly limit

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the monthly limit

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Employer Must Pay $240,000 to Employee for Pension Fund Negligence

By ניצן שפירUpdated 22 minutes ago
Translated & summarized from Globes by baba
The story · English

A labor court in Be'er Sheva has ordered an employer to pay NIS 890,000 (approximately $240,000) to an employee who became disabled four years after a brief 52-day period of employment. The employer, "Mimon David Packaging and Chemical Services," failed to transfer pension contributions to the employee's fund during his short tenure, severing his continuous pension coverage and rendering him ineligible for disability benefits.

The court ruled that the employer's failure to remit the funds constituted an administrative lapse. The employee had been insured with Menora Mivtachim Pension Fund since 2001. He began working for the company in May 2016 as a maintenance manager and was employed for only 52 days, from May until mid-July. Although the employer deducted pension contributions from his June salary, these funds were never transferred to the pension provider.

Following the interruption in contributions, the pension fund treated the employee as a new member. Four years later, when the employee lost his ability to work, his claim for disability pension was denied because the fund considered his condition a pre-existing illness, and he had not met the required 60-month waiting period for new members.

The employer argued that the employee had not cooperated, provided false health declarations, and had not specified his preferred pension fund. They also claimed they were not legally obligated to insure him due to his short employment period, less than three months, and that the employee had contractually waived this right. However, the court found that the employee's actions on the intake form did not constitute a waiver and that the employer was aware of his active pension fund. The court emphasized that under the mandatory pension order, employees are entitled to pension contributions from their first day of work, with retroactive payments possible.

The court rejected the employer's claims of shared responsibility and stated that the employee's loss of disability pension rights was a direct result of the employer's failure to transfer the deducted funds. The employee's lawyer hailed the ruling as a significant message to employers about the non-waivable nature of pension obligations, even for short employment periods. The employer's lawyer called the decision "outrageous and unreasonable," stating they intend to appeal to the National Labor Court.

Read the original at Globes
Full coverage · 2 outlets
First: Globes · 28m ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Unrated 2
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Ask About This Article

Duki reads it, and every newsroom on the same story, then answers with sources.

Open the live terminal