Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories (in the app)
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the monthly limit

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

to move · to open · esc to close

Live Terminal

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories (in the app)
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the monthly limit

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Israeli Court Approves Class Action Against Banks Over Unpaid Interest

By ג'ניפר סילוןOngoing story · 5 updates
Translated & summarized from Globes by baba
The story · English

An Israeli district court has approved a class-action lawsuit against four major Israeli banks: Leumi, Mizrahi Tefahot, Discount, and International Bank. The lawsuit alleges that the banks failed to pay customers interest on their current account balances or to inform them about options for investing these funds in interest-bearing accounts.

The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys Yitzhak Aviram and Shahar Ben Meir, argue that the banks breached their duty of good faith and trust by not providing interest on current account "overdrafts" (yetirot zchut), especially given the significant rise in interest rates since April 2022. A financial opinion attached to the lawsuit estimates the total damages to customers could range from 3.62 to 5.06 billion shekels.

The banks, however, contend that there is no legal basis requiring them to pay interest on current account balances. They assert that their agreements with customers explicitly address this issue and that current accounts are intended for immediate access, not as investment vehicles. The banks also claim they do inform customers about interest-bearing deposit options and sometimes offer interest on current accounts as a discretionary benefit.

The Supervisor of Banks submitted his position, opposing intervention in bank product pricing and stating that mandating interest payments on current accounts would be a flawed move. The court, in approving the class action, found a prima facie cause of action based on unjust enrichment, stating that the banks profit from holding customer funds in current accounts without paying interest on them.

Read the original at Globes
Full coverage · 9 outlets
75% centerFirst: Ice · 5h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 3Right 1Unrated 5
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the live terminal