Netanyahu Exploits Arab Party Alliance Fears to Undermine Opposition Leader
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Likud officials are actively campaigning against opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot, accusing him of planning to form a left-wing government with Arab parties and Yair Golan. This strategy emerged after reports, later dismissed as fake news by "Radio A-Shams," claimed Eisenkot had promised to include the Ra'am party in a future coalition. Eisenkot and his party vehemently denied these claims, releasing footage of his meetings with Bedouin council heads and stating that any government partners must recognize Israel's values as a Jewish and democratic state and be willing to perform military or national service. A new condition was added, specifying that parties must not recognize Hamas as a terrorist organization Israel must destroy, a criterion only one designated Ra'am Knesset member, Yoav Segalovitz, currently meets.
The controversy has also created friction between Eisenkot and his potential coalition partner, Avigdor Lieberman. Eisenkot urged his allies to support his leadership, while Lieberman demanded clarity on his potential partners after the election. Netanyahu has amplified these divisions, portraying Eisenkot as a "traitor" who would ally with "left-wing Arabs," echoing past Likud campaign narratives. This public "ping-pong" is expected to continue until election day.
Eisenkot faces a significant challenge in navigating the sensitive issue of potential alliances with Arab parties, especially in the current political climate following the October 7th attacks, which has seen a public shift to the right. Many voters are reportedly deterred by the prospect of a government involving Arab parties, even those loyal to the state. Eisenkot's campaign is struggling to counter Netanyahu's anti-Arab rhetoric and has yet to present a convincing response. Analysts suggest Eisenkot needs to shift the public discourse back to his campaign's core issues, such as the October 7th disaster, the conscription law, international isolation, the cost of living, and institutional corruption, especially with the elections less than six weeks away.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.