IDF Chief of Staff Defends Military Against Film's Allegations
IDF Chief of Staff Aviv Kochavi has publicly responded to the controversy surrounding the documentary film "Nezah," which alleges systematic harm to civilians in Gaza. Speaking at an event honoring donors to the Association for the Soldier, Kochavi stated, "We adhere to the values of the IDF and international law and do everything in our power to avoid harming innocents." He accused those behind the film of using "lies and baseless manipulations" to tarnish the reputation of IDF soldiers and commanders.
Kochavi asserted that the IDF is "the most moral army in the world" and emphasized the military's commitment to its values and international law, even in the face of deliberate attacks on Israeli civilians and rocket fire from Gaza. The film "Nezah," directed by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Shore, premiered in Venice and won a special jury prize. It features anonymous testimonies from 24 military and intelligence personnel claiming the IDF caused civilian deaths in Gaza.
The controversy has garnered significant international media attention, with reports focusing on the reactions within Israel and potential actions against those involved. The film's screening and the subsequent backlash, including a call by Culture Minister Miki Zohar to revoke the creators' citizenship, have been highlighted as evidence of a deep divide between Israel's self-perception and its international image, according to the New York Times. The article also notes that the strong opposition to the film transcends political lines within Israel, citing former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot's criticism alongside government responses.
The British Times reported on the film's allegations of using technology to target individuals in Gaza and noted that the interviewees' identities were concealed for their protection. The film's claims of civilian casualties and the government's strong reactions, including the potential revocation of citizenship for its creators, have become central to international reporting on the issue.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.