Opposition Slams Smotrich and Rotman's Judicial Overhaul Plan
Opposition leaders have sharply criticized a new plan by Religious Zionism party leaders Bezalel Smotrich and Simcha Rotman aimed at reforming Israel's judicial system. The plan, expected to be advanced after the upcoming elections, has drawn strong condemnation from figures like Benny Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot.
Former Defense Minister Gadi Eisenkot denounced a video released by the Religious Zionism party against the judiciary as "despicable and violent." He accused Smotrich of attempting to represent the Religious Zionist community while actually harming its reputation. Eisenkot further stated that Smotrich and Rotman "have learned nothing from October 7th" and are willing to drag Israeli society into an abyss, vowing to "send them home soon" for the sake of Israel's future.
Benny Gantz, leader of the National Unity party, echoed the criticism, simply stating to Smotrich and Rotman, "You have learned nothing." Yair Golan, leader of the Democrats, also fiercely attacked the video, calling it "dangerous incitement and a call for bloodshed." Golan accused Smotrich and Rotman of targeting Supreme Court justices and the Attorney General as enemies, asserting that with public rejection, "incitement is all they have left." He pledged to "put an end to this" on October 27th, promising to replace them, repair the damage, and restore responsible, strong, and democratic leadership to Israel.
The controversy arises as Smotrich and Rotman advance their plan to reform the judicial system and regulate relations between the branches of government. Details indicate the plan will continue the trajectory of changes seen in recent years, including the cancellation of the reasonableness standard, altering the composition of the Judicial Appointments Committee, changing the selection process for the ombudsman for judges, and reducing the power of the Attorney General. This represents another significant political front opening around the judiciary, a central issue during the previous government and now a key focus of the campaign for the next elections.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.