Gantz Rejects Calls to Resign, Vows to Be 'National Arbiter'
Benny Gantz, a prominent Israeli politician, has rejected calls for him to resign from politics, stating instead that he intends to serve as the "national arbiter" if a deadlock occurs following the upcoming elections. He warned that without a strong "Blue and White" party, Israel risks being drawn into repeated elections.
Gantz asserted that if the election results in a tie between the political blocs, he would not support either side in forming a government by "completing 61" seats. Instead, he plans to demand that both sides enter a room, where he will mediate. He stated he would assess which bloc received greater legitimacy and ensure concessions are made to establish a broad, cross-bloc unity government. Gantz emphasized the necessity of a "Zionist, cross-bloc government" that is not dependent on sectoral parties, arguing that such a government is crucial for Israel's future and that sectarianism is detrimental.
Addressing his party's standing in polls, which have shown "Blue and White" struggling to pass the electoral threshold, Gantz remained resolute. He drew a parallel to his past experiences, noting that similar situations did not lead to government formation and that his focus remains on achieving that goal. He dismissed personal considerations, stating his commitment to the country overrides any personal slights or poll numbers.
Gantz also criticized the government's handling of national security, particularly the delay in budget transfers, which he attributed to prioritizing sectoral interests over national decisions. He cited the example of delayed fighter jet acquisitions. While acknowledging significant military achievements since October 7th, he argued that the government has failed to translate these into political successes, a responsibility he places on the Prime Minister.
Regarding the film "NezA," which has drawn criticism for its portrayal of IDF actions during the war, Gantz acknowledged the use of AI in decision-making processes to support commanders amidst vast amounts of information. He stressed that all targets are approved by commanders and that all possible measures are taken to avoid civilian casualties, despite the challenges posed by terrorist organizations using civilians as shields. He called the film's creators irresponsible for their portrayal.