Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Ask Duki without the monthly limit — answers from the coverage, with sources
  • Save articles, synced between the web and the app
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

to move · to open · esc to close

Live Terminal

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Ask Duki without the monthly limit — answers from the coverage, with sources
  • Save articles, synced between the web and the app
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Politics13:27 · Sep 14

Judicial Ethics Committee Sets New Boundaries for Judges' Public Engagements

By אפרת ברינרUpdated 7 days ago
Translated & summarized from Now 14 by baba
The story · English

The Judicial Ethics Committee has ruled that a judge cannot lecture at a professional development seminar organized by the Israel Bar Association's publishing house, due to its for-profit nature. The committee's decision, published Monday, stems from a request by a court president seeking clarification on the ethical implications of such an engagement.

While judges are generally permitted to participate in professional events and seminars organized by the Bar Association, the committee distinguished between the Bar Association's public activities and its publishing house, which operates as a limited company with profit motives. The committee cited Rule 29 of the Judges' Ethics Regulations, which allows judges to lecture occasionally for non-commercial entities without prior approval.

Based on this rule, the committee has previously allowed judges to participate in seminars and study days organized by the Bar Association and its institutions. However, in this specific case, the committee found a significant difference because the seminar was presented as part of the publishing house's activities, not the Bar Association's general professional development.

The committee emphasized that private and commercial publishing houses operating for profit present an ethical conflict for judges, as their lectures could potentially advance commercial interests. The committee clarified that the prohibition is not absolute if a commercial entity provides only technical or administrative support for a public body's event, citing a previous case involving the Nevo publishing house where the entity provided only technical support for a government ministry's course.

In the current case, lacking further details about the exact nature of the seminar and its participants, the committee concluded that there is an ethical impediment to the judge delivering the lecture. The decision underscores the committee's stance on maintaining the integrity of the judiciary by avoiding even the appearance of impropriety or commercial influence.

Read the original at Now 14
Open the live terminal