Economy15:46 · 5h ago

Food Importer Baladi Sued for $330,000 Over Alleged Logo Infringement

Calcalist
Translated & summarized from Calcalist by baba
The story · English

Food importer Baladi, controlled by Erez Dahabani, is facing a NIS 1.2 million (approximately $330,000) lawsuit from the company Chi Bari. Chi Bari alleges that Baladi has been marking its products with a logo that closely resembles Chi Bari's "Chi Bari" quality mark.

Chi Bari operates to promote quality and safety in the meat industry and uses its "Chi Bari" quality mark to help consumers identify meat products produced under proper conditions and according to the company's standards. Chi Bari claims Baladi began using a logo similar to the one it developed seven years ago. The "Chi Bari" mark is based on strict procedures for animal welfare and breeding, with Chi Bari maintaining a supervision system throughout the supply chain to ensure its credibility.

Chi Bari, which has held a registered trademark in Israel since 2019 for meat, fish, poultry, eggs, and milk, is seeking a court order for Baladi to remove the infringing marks from all products, packaging, labels, and advertising materials. They also want Baladi to cease distributing, marketing, selling, or offering for sale any products bearing these marks. Chi Bari stated that it recently became aware of Baladi's use of the similar mark, which could mislead consumers into believing Baladi's products meet Chi Bari's standards or that a commercial relationship exists between the companies.

Furthermore, Chi Bari claims it has received inquiries from its own customers who have experienced damages due to Baladi's use of the similar marking. After an initial warning letter and unsuccessful attempts at an amicable resolution, Chi Bari filed the lawsuit and an opposition to Baladi's trademark application.

Dr. Dan Chi, representing Chi Bari, emphasized the case's significance for intellectual property and reputation protection, stating that protecting registered trademarks, especially quality marks, is crucial for fair competition and consumer trust. He warned that similar marks on products not meeting quality standards could mislead the public, devalue the mark, and harm businesses that adhere to its represented standards, particularly concerning public health and quality.

Read the original at Calcalist
Open the live terminal