Judge Solberg Warns of Election Divisiveness, Urges Unity
Supreme Court Justice Noam Solberg delivered a speech Thursday at the opening of the new legal year, addressing the upcoming elections, societal polarization, and the importance of maintaining the integrity of the electoral process. He cautioned against internal and external forces seeking to sow discord and division, stating, "The election period is turbulent. Candidates are like wolves to each other. Tempers flare." Solberg urged vigilance against these elements, warning, "If they succeed, we will all lose."
Solberg dedicated a significant portion of his remarks to the meaning of democracy, referencing the late Professor Ruth Gavison's view that democracy's strength lies in "counting all citizens." He elaborated that this extends beyond vote tabulation to ensuring citizens' voices are heard and respected, both during and after elections. He also called for open and respectful public discourse, even amidst sharp disagreements, encouraging listening, persuasion, and acknowledging that "not all truth is with us."
He further praised those who pursue compromise and moderation, particularly in a hostile climate where such approaches might be perceived as weakness. Solberg described the pursuit of unity, compromise, and peace against prevailing trends as a "noble, brave, truly heroic struggle."
Concluding his address, Solberg emphasized the sanctity of elections as "democracy's compass." He asserted that safeguarding electoral integrity is a shared responsibility, falling not only on the Central Elections Committee but also on all state authorities and citizens. True electoral integrity, he explained, means voters can cast their ballots "without fear, without coercion, by free will, and without undue influence." This also encompasses the safety of voters and election workers, the continuity of the election system, accurate vote counting, and the state's ability to counter attempts to undermine public trust in the process and its outcomes. Solberg assured the audience that the Elections Committee is doing "everything possible."
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.