District Court Partly Rejects Gottlieb’s Immunity Claim in Brsler Defamation Dispute
The District Court partly rejected a request by MK Tally Gottlieb, ruling that factual publications about the husband of Prof. Shikma Bressler are not covered by parliamentary immunity. The case concerns the scope of immunity for statements made in connection with public political disputes.
The decision was reported on July 16 at 16:25 by Aviad Glickman. The article did not provide further details about the specific publication, the reasoning beyond the quoted ruling, or the next procedural steps in the case.
The ruling appears to narrow the protection Gottlieb sought, at least in relation to factual claims about Bressler’s husband. The case was heard in the District Court and is part of a broader legal conflict involving Gottlieb and Bressler.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
