מסוף חי
פוליטיקה · סיקור מלא

As Netanyahu’s Cross-Examination Ends, Criticism of the Cases Deepens

איך 3 חדרי חדשות ישראליים סיפרו את הסיפור הזה, זה לצד זה.

67% center
Center 2Right 1

דווח לראשונה בWalla · Jun 20, 2026

מה קרה

After Netanyahu’s cross-examination ended, attorney Eyal Besserlilk said the cases against him have suffered from major investigative and prosecutorial flaws. He argued that Case 4000, Case 1000 and other files are weakened by missing approvals, disputed evidence and a prosecution under pressure.

  • 01Besserlilk says the Netanyahu cases suffered from failures in testimony, investigations and prosecution handling.
  • 02He argues evidence gathered without attorney general approval should be invalid.
  • 03He says judges saw no bribery case in Case 4000 and urged dropping that charge.
  • 04He claims the prosecution tried, and failed, to amend the indictment after Filber testified.
  • 05He says Case 1000 remains the prosecution’s only real strength, but is still weak.

התקציר תורגם וסוכם מהמקורות למטה על ידי baba. לקריאה המלאה פתחו כל מקור.

In this story
People
Benjamin NetanyahuShlomo Filber
OrganizationsAttorney General, prosecution, court

סיקור מלא · 3 מקורות

אותו אירוע, כפי שכל חדר חדשות דיווח עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה כדי להשוות במה כל אחד מדגיש ומה הוא משמיט.

סיפורים קשורים

Netanyahu’s Cross-Examination Ends With No Collapse, But Many Gaps in His MemoryJun 17, 2026Netanyahu lashes out in court during cross-examination over Case 2000Jun 16, 2026Israel’s Case Against Netanyahu: What His Testimony Means for Case 4000Jun 22, 2026Judges Signal Weak Evidence in Netanyahu Bribery Case Ahead of Trial ConclusionJul 6, 2026Netanyahu Ends Testimony With Harsh Attack on Investigators and ProsecutionJun 24, 2026Netanyahu Testifies in Tel Aviv as Judges Reject Request to Shorten HearingJun 16, 2026