Politics08:54 · 11m ago

Tel Aviv Luxury Building Inheritance Dispute Ends With Equal Property Split in Divorce Case

Calcalist
Translated & summarized from Calcalist by baba
The story · English

In a recent divorce proceeding, a man contested his former partner's claim to 50% ownership of a luxury building in Tel Aviv, inherited from her late father and valued at approximately 150 million shekels. The man argued for an unequal division of their shared assets, citing the significant economic disparity and his medical condition, seeking to retain full rights to his pension savings. However, the Central District Court rejected his request, reaffirming the legal principle of equal division of property acquired during marriage, regardless of one spouse's inheritance.

The couple had been married for over 25 years. The woman inherited rights in the Tel Aviv building, which generate rental income exceeding 100,000 shekels monthly, in addition to her employment income. The man, a businessman and startup partner, claimed the financial gap justified an unequal split favoring him. The court emphasized that exceptions to equal division apply only in cases of genuine financial hardship, not to redistribute inherited assets.

The court upheld a family court ruling that the man failed to prove exceptional circumstances warranting his claim. After balancing resources, he retained significant wealth and had not sacrificed his career for the marriage. The judges noted the inheritance as an external asset excluded from division and ruled the husband has no right to diminish or claim compensation from it through the shared property.

Despite the ruling, the judges expressed regret that the parties did not reach a settlement, noting they had proposed compromises requiring minimal concessions from the woman, which she declined. The court imposed moderate legal costs of 10,000 shekels payable by the man to the woman. The man’s attorneys indicated they are reviewing the verdict and considering an appeal to the Supreme Court, arguing the case warranted judicial discretion for a fairer outcome under the law.

The legal representatives for the man were Ruth Dayan Wolfner and Shelly Yahav, while the woman was represented by Yehudit Meisles and Hofit Ben Ezra Cohen.

Read the original at Calcalist
Open the live terminal