Sara Netanyahu Presses for Extended Security Detail Despite Official Opposition
Translated & summarized from Mako by baba
Sara Netanyahu has requested a five-year extension of security for herself and her sons, but the National Security Council and Shin Bet oppose the move, citing disproportionate risk assessment. The issue remains unresolved amid classified discussions and official denials.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Sara Netanyahu seeks a five-year security extension for herself and her sons.
- The request was to be discussed by the Ministerial Committee on Shin Bet Affairs but was postponed.
- National Security Council and Shin Bet oppose the long-term extension as disproportionate.
- Security agencies prefer protection tied to threat levels, not fixed terms.
- The Prime Minister's Office denies the report's accuracy.
- Discussions remain classified with no public decision yet.
Sara Netanyahu, wife of the Israeli Prime Minister, has been pushing security officials at the National Security Council and the Shin Bet to extend her personal security and that of her sons, Yair and Avner, for an additional five years. This request was made ahead of a scheduled discussion by the Ministerial Committee on Shin Bet Affairs, which has since been postponed. Sara Netanyahu argues that since former defense ministers receive automatic five-year security protection after leaving office, she and her children deserve the same due to ongoing threats against them.
However, sources familiar with the matter reveal that both the National Security Council and the Shin Bet oppose granting such a long-term security extension at this time. They contend that while threats exist, especially amid the current tense situation involving Iran, a five-year security guarantee is disproportionate and lacks a solid basis. The Shin Bet is expected to recommend security protection without a fixed term, instead tying it to changes in the threat level.
Neither the Shin Bet nor the National Security Council have publicly commented on the issue, citing the classified nature of the discussions. The Prime Minister's Office denied the accuracy of the report. The debate highlights tensions between the Prime Minister's family and security agencies over the scope and duration of protective measures.
Mentioned
