Hidden Research Reveals Risks of Gender Segregation in Advanced Haredi Academic Programs

A dramatic bill proposed by Knesset member Limor Son Har-Melech from Otzma Yehudit, recently passed its first reading and is set for further readings next week. The bill would allow gender-segregated studies in advanced university degrees, particularly in therapeutic fields. However, an extensive research report commissioned by the Council for Higher Education (CHE) in December 2024, which examined the professional and academic implications of such segregation, was reportedly suppressed and never formally discussed.

The study, conducted by the Tzafnat Institute, addressed key questions about the need for culturally adapted therapists in the Haredi community, student motivations, barriers to higher education, and whether gender segregation is the main obstacle. It found a significant mental health crisis in the Haredi sector and a strong desire among students for academic advancement. While about half of respondents considered gender segregation a top factor, many also indicated willingness to study in mixed-gender classes if other supports like financial aid and flexible schedules were provided.

Critically, the research highlighted serious concerns from professionals, including Haredi psychologists and social workers, that gender segregation undermines core therapeutic principles and academic rigor. Examples include limited exposure to essential psychoanalytic theories and restricted critical thinking due to religious oversight. The report recommended against expanding gender-segregated advanced degrees, except possibly in music and dance therapy, and suggested alternative measures such as geographic accessibility, scholarships, preparatory courses, and partial segregation only in initial study phases.

Despite the report’s completion over a year and a half ago, it was withheld from public and parliamentary scrutiny. Sources claim Education Minister Yoav Kish, who also chairs the CHE, blocked discussion because the findings conflicted with his policy agenda. Kish denies involvement, stating the matter remained at professional levels. The controversy has sparked calls from opposition Knesset members for urgent review of the suppressed research.

The debate reflects broader tensions between liberal and conservative forces regarding Haredi integration into higher education. Critics argue that gender segregation perpetuates control over a vulnerable population and compromises educational quality, while supporters frame it as cultural accommodation. The CHE emphasized its commitment to Haredi inclusion but noted no decision has been made pending review of the study. Meanwhile, the bill’s progress continues amid growing public and political scrutiny.