Israeli Government Refuses to Comply With Supreme Court Ruling on Second Authority Council
The Israeli government has unanimously decided not to recognize the Supreme Court's ruling regarding the Second Authority Council, sparking sharp political criticism. The court had frozen the government's appointments of a new council and ordered the outgoing council to continue until a final decision on petitions. The government declared that any court ruling contradicting the law would not be recognized and that decisions made by the council under the court's interim order would be null and void.
Opposition leaders condemned the government's stance as an attempt to normalize disobedience to the judiciary ahead of elections. Yair Golan, chairman of the Democratic camp, accused the government of preparing to reject election results and warned of public outrage if officials refuse to accept voters' decisions. Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot and former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett also criticized the government for undermining democracy and warned of anarchy if court rulings are ignored.
The dispute centers on the composition and legitimacy of the Second Authority Council, which oversees commercial television and radio broadcasts in Israel. The government appointed a new council in March, but multiple petitions challenged these appointments. The Supreme Court found "serious suspicion" that resignations from the outgoing council aimed to obstruct judicial review, and ruled that resigning members should not be counted toward the council's quorum.
Justice Minister Yariv Levin and Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi, who led the government's decision, argued that the court ruling contradicted the law and violated the separation of powers. They claim the outgoing council lacks the minimum two-thirds quorum required by law, rendering its decisions invalid. The political battle reflects broader tensions over judicial authority and governance ahead of upcoming elections.
Key political figures from the opposition have called for a decisive electoral victory to prevent the government from undermining democratic institutions. The government’s refusal to comply with the Supreme Court ruling marks a significant constitutional crisis in Israel’s democracy.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.