Israeli Government Unanimously Rejects Supreme Court Ruling on Second Authority for Television
Translated & summarized from Mako by baba
The Israeli government unanimously rejected a Supreme Court ruling reinstating the Second Authority council despite its noncompliance with legal membership requirements, declaring it will not recognize any council actions unless they meet the law's explicit conditions. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi and Justice Minister Yariv Levin criticized the court for overstepping its authority and vowed to uphold legislative supremacy and the rule of law.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Israeli government unanimously refuses to honor Supreme Court ruling on Second Authority council.
- Court reinstated council despite membership below legal minimum, prompting government backlash.
- Government will not recognize any council decisions unless legal membership criteria are met.
- Communications Minister Karhi accused court of overstepping and ignoring clear legal conditions.
- Justice Minister Levin emphasized separation of powers and pledged to restore rule of law.
- Government rejects any reliance on actions from a non-compliant council in the media sector.
On July 5, 2026, the Israeli government unanimously approved a proposal by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi and Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Minister Yariv Levin to refuse recognition of a Supreme Court ruling regarding the Second Authority for Television and Radio. The court had reinstated the council of the Second Authority despite its membership falling below the legally mandated minimum threshold. The government declared it would not acknowledge any decisions, approvals, appointments, or actions taken by the council unless it meets the explicit legal requirements.
Ministers Karhi and Levin emphasized that the rule of law applies to all branches of government, including the judiciary, and that a ruling contradicting clear statutory language cannot confer authority not granted by law. They further stated that no reliance claims or de facto actions by media market entities based on decisions from a non-compliant council would be accepted.
Minister Karhi criticized the Supreme Court for overstepping its authority, asserting that judges are not the legislature and cannot disregard explicit legal conditions. He stressed that the government will not endorse judicial decisions that undermine parliamentary laws. Justice Minister Levin highlighted the importance of separation of powers, insisting that the government must ensure that only the law serves as the source of governmental authority. He pledged to continue using all legal means to restore the rule of law.
This confrontation marks a significant constitutional clash between the Israeli government and the Supreme Court over the interpretation and enforcement of legal standards governing public broadcasting oversight. The government’s stance signals ongoing tensions regarding judicial authority and legislative supremacy in Israel’s democratic system.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 5Right 3Haredi 2Other 2
