Israeli Government Refuses to Recognize Communications Authority Decisions Without Legal Compliance
Translated & summarized from Walla by baba
The Israeli government has decided not to recognize any decisions by the Second Authority Council unless it meets legal membership requirements, following a Supreme Court ruling allowing the council to continue operating despite lacking the minimum members. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi and Justice Minister Yariv Levin criticized the court ruling, asserting it violates the rule of law and separation of powers. The government plans to use all legal tools to enforce compliance with statutory conditions.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Israeli government refuses to recognize Second Authority Council decisions lacking legal quorum.
- Decision follows June 17 Supreme Court ruling allowing council to operate with fewer members.
- Government stresses rule of law applies to all branches, including judiciary.
- Communications Minister Karhi criticizes court for overriding explicit legal conditions.
- Justice Minister Levin warns ruling violates separation of powers principle.
- Government vows to use all legal means to restore rule of law compliance.
The Israeli government unanimously approved a resolution on Sunday proposed by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi and Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Minister Yariv Levin. The resolution states that the government will not recognize any decisions, appointments, or actions taken by the Second Authority Council unless it meets the legal threshold requirements set by law. This move follows a June 17 Supreme Court ruling that ordered the continuation of the Second Authority Council's activities despite the government’s claim that the council currently has fewer members than the minimum required by law.
The government’s decision emphasizes that the rule of law applies to all branches of government, including the judiciary, and that a court ruling contradicting explicit legal provisions cannot grant authority that does not exist. It further declares that the government will not acknowledge any actions taken by a council that does not meet the statutory minimum membership and will reject any reliance on such decisions by stakeholders in the communications sector.
Minister Karhi criticized the Supreme Court ruling, stating that "Supreme Court judges are not the Knesset, and an abuse of power does not grant authority to erase explicit legal conditions. The rule of law is not the rule of judges." Justice Minister Levin also condemned the court, saying that "when a ruling directly contradicts the wording of the law, it is not judicial review but a violation of the separation of powers principle." He affirmed that the government will continue to use all legal means to restore the rule of law.
This dispute highlights ongoing tensions between the Israeli government and the judiciary over authority and legal interpretation, particularly concerning regulatory bodies like the Second Authority Council responsible for communications oversight.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 5Right 3Haredi 2Other 2
