Sign in to baba News

The Desk, the news read to you every hour, is part of News Plus.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Israeli Supreme Court Reviews Petitions Against Michael Regev's State Comptroller Appointment

By ענבר טויזר
Translated & summarized from Mako by baba
Israeli Supreme Court Reviews Petitions Against Michael Regev's State Comptroller Appointment
Editorial illustration generated by baba News — not a photograph of the event.
The story · English

The Israeli Supreme Court convened a panel of five justices on June 28, 2026, to hear petitions challenging the appointment process of Michael Regev as State Comptroller. Petitioners argued that the parliamentary vote was flawed because members of the Knesset recorded themselves voting, violating the principle of ballot secrecy. Present in the courtroom were Knesset members Tali Gottlieb, Miki Levy, and Karin Elharar. During the session, Supreme Court President Itzhak Amit recalled previous rulings that described an "undesirable cloud" over the process and noted that the court had issued a conditional order which the Knesset Speaker rejected.

Tensions arose when MK Tali Gottlieb interrupted the hearing and was asked to leave by the court president, leading to a brief confrontation. Legal counsel for the Knesset, Attorney Yitzhak Bart, argued there was no explicit prohibition against MKs recording their votes behind the voting booth curtain. Justice Barak-Erez questioned the implications of this absence of clear rules, suggesting past practices might have been improper. Justice Ruth Ronen noted a possible informal atmosphere encouraging MKs to document their votes, potentially pressuring others to do the same.

Justice Sohlberg criticized the Knesset members for undermining ballot secrecy, emphasizing that voting should remain confidential behind a curtain despite freedom of speech before and after voting. The court debated the lack of explicit legal provisions on whether voters may film themselves during the vote, with references to historical Jewish law practices. Attorney Bart acknowledged that while MKs can disclose their votes, the secrecy inside the voting booth remains essential. The court's deliberations focused on whether the secrecy principle was effectively nullified by the recordings and what that means for the legitimacy of Regev's appointment.

The hearing continues as the court weighs the legal and procedural validity of the voting process that led to Michael Regev's selection as State Comptroller, a key oversight position in Israel's government.

Read the original at Mako
Full coverage · 13 outlets
55% centerFirst: Behadrei Haredim · Jun 28

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 6Right 5Unrated 2
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Ask About This Article

Duki reads it, and every newsroom on the same story, then answers with sources.

Open the live terminal