Ofer Winter Launches Party, Rules Out Serving Under Bennett or Liberman

Former IDF general Ofer Winter, who recently launched his "Am Israel" party, stated in his first interview since the launch that he would not serve in a government led by Naftali Bennett or Avigdor Liberman. Winter explained his rationale, citing his opposition to the political maneuvering that led to Bennett's premiership, which he felt disregarded voter intent. He also detailed his plan for integrating the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) community into the IDF, emphasizing that those who do not serve would not receive state benefits.

Winter addressed criticism and attacks from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's circle, interpreting them as a sign that his party is making an impact. He acknowledged that his party is currently polling below the electoral threshold in some surveys but vowed to reassess his political path if this trend continues closer to the election. Despite criticizing politicians who were in power during the failures leading up to the October 7th Hamas attacks, Winter indicated he would recommend Netanyahu for prime minister, positioning himself within the right-wing bloc.

Regarding the Haredi draft issue, Winter proposed legislation that would link state benefits to military or national service, stating, "If you haven't regulated your status, you won't receive rights from the state." He also expressed a desire for a broad right-wing government under Netanyahu, suggesting that figures like Liberman and Bennett could be part of it, but reiterated his refusal to serve under them. Winter also touched upon the war in Gaza, advocating for a strategy that would isolate Hamas by relocating the civilian population, contrasting it with the current approach.

Winter also responded to criticism from former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, who questioned his suitability for a ministerial role due to a lack of strategic command experience. Winter countered by highlighting his own career progression and leadership roles, suggesting that strategic thinking should prioritize soldiers' lives over enemy civilians, a stance he believes differs from some senior military leadership.