Referees Association Rules No Penalty for Maccabi Haifa Against Hapoel Ramat Gan
Translated & summarized from N12 by baba
The Israeli Referees Association ruled that a penalty awarded to Maccabi Haifa against Hapoel Ramat Gan was incorrect, supporting VAR's recommendation to cancel it. The referee was also criticized for delaying too long during the VAR review. Maccabi Haifa won the match 2-1 despite the missed penalty.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Referees Association confirmed no foul occurred in Maccabi Haifa's awarded penalty.
- VAR intervention was justified and should have been accepted by the referee.
- Eitan Azulai missed the penalty in the 84th minute against Hapoel Ramat Gan.
- Referee took too long reviewing the incident on the pitch monitor.
- Maccabi Haifa won the match 2-1 in the Israeli Premier League opener.
Maccabi Haifa won 2-1 against Hapoel Ramat Gan in the opening round of the Israeli Premier League on August 26, but a controversial penalty decision overshadowed the match. In the 84th minute, Andrea Novakovic entered the penalty area and fell after a borderline contact with Hapoel Ramat Gan player Moshe Semel. The referee awarded a penalty to Maccabi Haifa, which Eitan Azulai missed, failing to extend the lead.
Following the match, the Israeli Referees Association reviewed the incident and concluded that the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) intervention was justified and that no foul had occurred. The association stated that the on-field referee should have accepted the VAR recommendation and canceled the penalty. They also criticized the referee for taking an excessively long time reviewing the incident on the pitch monitor, which goes against the association's guidelines.
This ruling clarifies that the penalty call was incorrect and highlights the importance of adhering to VAR decisions promptly. The association's statement emphasized the expectation that referees follow VAR advice to ensure accurate officiating in the league.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 3Right 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.