US Officials Say Israel Used Intelligence to Influence Trump Over Alleged Iranian Assassination Plot
The Washington Post revealed that intelligence about a possible Iranian assassination attempt on then-US President Donald Trump, which led to secretive security measures during the NATO summit in Ankara in June, originated from Israeli sources. However, the CIA considered this information to be of "low credibility." Despite doubts, US intelligence took significant precautions due to previous near-misses involving Trump, with one official noting that Israeli intelligence sharing seemed aimed more at influencing US policy decisions than purely warning the president.
An anonymous former US intelligence official accused Israel of a pattern of using intelligence to shape the worldview of US leadership to affect presidential decisions. The report cited an example where Senator Marco Rubio, briefed on the threat, voluntarily boarded the allegedly targeted plane, underscoring skepticism about the seriousness of the threat.
Additional articles highlighted regional security concerns, including the possibility of Saudi Arabia launching a ground offensive against the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen following escalated attacks on Saudi and Yemeni government targets. The Houthis’ increased aggression threatens their control in Yemen and risks provoking a broader conflict involving Saudi-backed forces.
Another report from The New York Times detailed how Iran adapted drone swarm tactics learned from the Russia-Ukraine conflict to down a US F-15 fighter jet in April. Iranian drones flying in tight formations provided targeting data that enabled a shoulder-fired missile strike. This new tactic has complicated US defense efforts in the Gulf, forcing adjustments to counter Iran’s integrated use of drones, missiles, and electronic warfare.
These developments illustrate ongoing tensions and strategic maneuvering involving Israel, Iran, and regional actors, with intelligence and military innovations playing key roles in shaping security dynamics in the Middle East.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
