Netanyahu Strategically Delays National Inquiry Law to Ensure Balanced Investigation

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has decided to postpone the legislation establishing a national inquiry committee, framing the move not as a retreat but as a strategic effort to guarantee a fair and unbiased investigation. This decision comes amid widespread public distrust in the current judicial system, particularly concerns over the committee's composition, which is influenced by the Supreme Court president's appointments.

The controversy centers on the likely appointment of Judge Itzhak Amit, viewed by many as a symbol of judicial activism and detachment from public sentiment. Netanyahu and his supporters argue that under the current system, the inquiry would be perceived as a predetermined outcome favoring the judiciary's elite, undermining public confidence.

Netanyahu's approach leverages the principle of "continuity law," aiming to resume the legislative process after the upcoming elections if he secures renewed public support. This would allow the formation of a more balanced committee representing diverse societal views rather than the judiciary's perspective alone.

Opponents, including left-wing factions and judicial officials, push for immediate establishment of the inquiry under the existing framework. However, Netanyahu contends that passing the law now amid political instability and potential government collapse would be futile, as a new administration might repeal it and impose a politically biased committee.

In the meantime, Netanyahu is prioritizing urgent legislation to maintain national stability, reserving the inquiry law for a time when a fair and trusted investigation can be assured. He frames this as a critical democratic choice between decisions made by self-appointed judges behind closed doors or by an equitable committee with broad public trust.