Israeli Government Plans to Cut Subsidies for Haredi Families with Draft Dodgers in Education Programs
The Israeli Ministry of Education will be required to prepare for the cessation of government subsidies for after-school programs serving Haredi families whose fathers evade military conscription, starting with the upcoming 2023-2024 school year. This move follows a legal push by the Attorney General, Gali Baharav-Miara, who informed the Supreme Court that the Ministry must revoke discounts and subsidies for the "Nitzanim" after-school frameworks attended by children of yeshiva students and Haredi draft evaders.
This policy marks a significant expansion of civil and economic sanctions against the Haredi sector, following an October 2022 Supreme Court ruling mandating state enforcement measures against those who refuse military service. The new sanction joins previous restrictions, including the removal of daycare discounts for toddlers and disqualification of yeshiva families from discounted housing lottery programs. However, due to logistical constraints, the Attorney General exempted summer programs known as "Schools of the Long Vacation" from the subsidy cuts, which will only take effect with the full start of the school year.
The financial impact is expected to be severe for tens of thousands of Haredi families, especially in major cities and concentrated Haredi communities where "Nitzanim" after-school programs provide essential childcare enabling mothers to work. The subsidy removal could increase monthly costs by several hundred shekels per child, imposing a heavy burden on large families, many of whom already live below the poverty line or under tight financial conditions.
The Haredi community responded with shock and anger, condemning the move as a "moral red line crossing and cruel collective punishment." Leaders accused the judiciary of attempting to harm children and infants as a political pressure tactic to break the Torah world. They described the policy as unprecedented insensitivity aimed at starving families and undermining basic education and welfare services.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.