Israeli Justice Minister Levin Demands End to Netanyahu Corruption Trial After Judges Recommend Dropping Bribery Charge
Israeli Justice Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Yariv Levin publicly called for an end to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's long-running corruption trial, following a dramatic development in the case. Levin criticized the judicial process, stating that law enforcement authorities had nine years to present evidence on the central bribery charge against Netanyahu but failed to do so. He accused the authorities of using improper means and urged to stop what he described as a "destructive event" by either granting a pardon or dismissing the trial.
Levin's remarks came after a panel of judges at the Jerusalem District Court reaffirmed their June 2023 position recommending the dismissal of the bribery charge in Case 4000. The judges stated that new testimonies and evidence, including Netanyahu's recent testimony, did not change their view that the bribery charge should be dropped. This judicial stance represents a significant challenge to the prosecution's case.
Levin emphasized that law enforcement leaders have been given a final chance to restore public trust in the justice system by minimizing the damage caused. He framed the situation as a critical moment to preserve the system's honor, either through a presidential pardon or by terminating the trial.
This position aligns with a recent admission by a senior official within the State Prosecution, who privately acknowledged the need to reconsider the continuation of the trial in light of the judges' recommendation. This marks the first notable crack in the prosecution's previously firm stance.
Political figures have echoed calls to end the trial. Defense Minister Israel Katz demanded immediate cancellation of the trial and accountability for those behind the indictment, while Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich warned that those responsible will eventually be held to account. These calls intensified after Netanyahu concluded his testimony, during which he revealed the immense pressure he faced to withdraw from Gaza in exchange for the release of hostages, an offer he rejected despite it being presented as a "great victory."
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.