Compare full coverage across 13 outlets
Politics09:59 · 34m ago

Israeli Court Reaffirms Lack of Evidence in Netanyahu Bribery Case, Sparking Political Backlash

Now 14Right
Translated & summarized from Now 14 by baba
The story · English

The judicial panel overseeing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trial has reiterated its June 2023 position, recommending that prosecutors reconsider the bribery charge in Case 4000 due to insufficient evidence. This reaffirmation came after hearing Netanyahu's testimony, maintaining the court's stance that the prosecution's case lacks solid proof.

Following the court's announcement, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar and Knesset member Moshe Saada sharply criticized the prosecution's handling of the case. Sa'ar condemned the prolonged legal process, calling it "absurd" and damaging to Israel, and accused the prosecution of ignoring the court's recommendation and refusing a mediation process proposed by the judiciary. He warned that continued prosecutorial resistance to dropping the bribery charge would be a disgrace.

Similarly, Saada accused the prosecution of persisting in a "witch hunt" against Netanyahu, alleging they are unwilling to reassess their position despite the court's clear statement of no evidence. He suggested the prosecution's actions are politically motivated attempts to undermine a sitting prime minister who remains electorally popular.

The prosecution had previously rejected the court's recommendation to drop the bribery charge in June 2023. The latest court statement puts pressure on the prosecution to reconsider its stance, but it remains to be seen if they will change course. The case has been ongoing for over six years, drawing significant political and public attention.

The controversy highlights deep divisions within Israeli politics and the judiciary over the handling of Netanyahu's legal battles, with key political figures calling for an end to what they describe as a damaging and unfounded prosecution.

Read the original at Now 14
Full coverage · 6 outlets
67% right-leaningFirst: Ynet · 1h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 2Right 4
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the live terminal