Spain’s 0-0 draw with Cape Verde in its World Cup opener has triggered immediate criticism and claims that a major chance was wasted, especially because Spain arrived with huge expectations after winning Euro 2024 two years ago. Cape Verde was playing its first-ever match at a World Cup, and Spain was widely expected to win comfortably, dominate the game and translate its superior quality into goals. Instead, the match ended in frustration, with Spain controlling play but failing to score.
The article argues that an opening stumble does not necessarily predict a failed tournament. Economist Alex Kramer examined the first matches of every eventual World Cup finalist since 1982, the first tournament played with 24 teams and the start of the modern era. Across 22 such opening games, finalists won 14, drew three and lost five. On average, those teams scored 2.05 goals and conceded 0.68 in their first match, meaning even successful teams usually began with narrow victories rather than overwhelming displays.
Germany is cited as the clearest exception, having opened some of its finalist campaigns emphatically, including the famous 8-0 win over Saudi Arabia in Japan and Korea and the 4-0 victory over Cristiano Ronaldo’s Portugal in Brazil. This year, Germany’s 7-1 win over Curacao is mentioned as another example that may fit that pattern. The broader explanation offered is psychological: top teams often arrive under intense pressure, and that can cause performance anxiety and early tension on the field.
Spain itself is presented as the best case study. In 2010, the eventual world champion began with a 1-0 loss to Switzerland in Durban on June 16, when Gelson Fernandes scored in the 52nd minute. Spain then recovered to win six straight matches, beating Honduras, Chile, Portugal, Paraguay, Germany and the Netherlands, conceding only once after that opening defeat. The conclusion is that it is too early to write Spain off, because major teams often build momentum gradually and early setbacks can be misleading.
