Israeli media figures sharply criticized Reuters' report of a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, calling the situation embarrassing and unclear. News 12 diplomatic correspondent Yaron Avraham reacted with a pointed question about whether Hezbollah would be allowed to attack Israeli soldiers again while Israel is expected to hold its fire, saying the arrangement was "embarrassment and shame." He also referred to U.S. pressure on Israel not to strike in Lebanon despite Hezbollah attacks.
Other commentators joined the backlash. News 13 analyst Suleiman Maswadeh mocked the shift in sourcing, writing that it was a "nice change" to get ceasefire news from Reuters instead of Al Jazeera, then asked whether anyone had heard from the prime minister or defense minister, calling the situation "insane." News 12 political analyst Amit Segal also responded with a series of questions about what the ceasefire would actually allow or prohibit.
Segal asked whether the IDF would still be able to act against emerging threats and whether it could continue destroying infrastructure. He said the only clear positive was that Israel would remain in an expanded security buffer zone, while the rest still needed to be examined.