Arab Parties Face Election Woes Amidst Internal Divisions

As elections approach, calls are intensifying within Israel's Arab community for political factions to unite and contest the vote with maximum strength. However, disagreements persist over the composition of electoral lists and potential alliances, including the controversial inclusion of former Knesset member Yoav Segalovich in the United Arab List. Professor Asa'ad Ghanem expressed concern that current Israeli policies, such as the eviction orders for unrecognized villages in the Negev, reflect a broader trend of discrimination against Arab citizens, blurring the lines between them and Palestinians in the occupied territories. He described the use of violence, restrictions, and exclusion from public life as part of a wider political strategy.

Ghanem believes the timing of these policies, coinciding with the election period, is particularly worrying, suggesting that weakening Arab electoral competition could benefit the Israeli right. He warned that the two weeks following the submission of lists might see attempts to disqualify Arab parties. The Israeli right, he noted, may view the upcoming elections as an opportunity to legitimize its approach to Arab citizens, underscoring the concern posed by a weak and fragmented Arab opposition.

Regarding internal Arab political disputes, Ghanem estimated that separate lists could secure around 12 to 13 Knesset seats, whereas a unified effort might have achieved 17 or 18. He argued that losing potentially five seats due to internal divisions effectively hands them to Zionist parties, which he deemed illogical given the current political climate. While not opposing Jewish candidates on Arab lists in principle, Ghanem cautioned that Segalovich's inclusion should not become an obstacle to forming a stronger joint list if that is the primary goal.

He suggested that a joint list could serve as a "technical" electoral arrangement, allowing parties to maintain their distinct platforms post-election. Despite their differences, Arab forces currently share the objective of changing the government, potentially even supporting an alternative candidate. Ghanem stressed that maximizing electoral strength should be the priority, rather than allowing personal or party-specific disputes to diminish Arab representation.

Addressing his stance on political pluralism, Ghanem clarified that he advocates for unity in elections without abandoning pluralism, which he sees as fundamental to democracy. He urged Arab parties to present clear political programs and questioned the practical agenda of a joint list for the Arab community. Ghanem emphasized the need for greater political and societal organization within the Arab community, especially in light of the Gaza war and developments in the West Bank and Negev, calling for enhanced coordination and joint action while preserving pluralism.

Finally, Ghanem did not rule out attempts to disrupt the electoral process itself, such as delaying elections or influencing voting in Arab communities. He warned of potential pressure tactics or technical means to interfere with the vote, stressing the necessity for the Arab community to prepare by organizing and consolidating its capabilities.