Anesthesiologist Warns of Medical Charlatanism Flourishing in Haredi Sector
Dr. Yochai Raviv, an anesthesiologist, has issued a stark warning about the burgeoning industry of medical charlatanism, particularly within the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) community. In an interview with 'Kikar HaShabbat,' he detailed how alternative medicine, often termed 'Big Wellness,' has grown to be five times larger than conventional medicine ('Big Pharma'). Dr. Raviv specifically called out 'frequency medicine,' which he described as a "laughable" practice using devices like small laptops to allegedly perform CT scans and blood tests, a claim he refutes as impossible compared to actual hospital equipment.
He explained that many alternative treatments are promoted with misleading claims, including the notion of "Ministry of Health approval." Dr. Raviv clarified that such approval only signifies a device is not harmful or emitting radiation, not that it is medically effective. He advised the public to be wary of treatments not recommended by their family doctor and to avoid "miracle cures" advertised online or through word-of-mouth.
The anesthesiologist highlighted a particularly dangerous trend within the Haredi community concerning pregnancy and childbirth. He noted that while social media is less prevalent there, information spreads through Shabbat newspapers, flyers, and personal recommendations. Dr. Raviv expressed deep concern over individuals offering "life-threatening" treatments for pregnant women and newborns, including "placenta warmers" and "pirate natural births."
Dr. Raviv also cautioned against "miracle diets" and unproven remedies for serious conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. While acknowledging that some dietary changes can be scientifically proven effective when guided by certified professionals, he warned against extreme weight-loss promises and the use of natural pills to treat severe illnesses. He urged people to rely on qualified medical professionals and avoid unverified alternative treatments that pose significant health risks.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.