Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

MakoSports

Hapoel Petah Tikva's Equalizer Disallowed Due to Offside Despite VAR Malfunction

Translated & summarized from Mako by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 2 newsrooms covering

Hapoel Petah Tikva's late equalizing goal against Ironi Tiberias was disallowed for offside despite a VAR video malfunction, with the professional committee confirming the offside interference justified the decision.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Hapoel Petah Tikva's goal was disallowed for offside in the 86th minute against Ironi Tiberias.
  • Referee Shnir Levi missed the offside call live but acted on VAR team advice despite a video malfunction.
  • The professional committee confirmed the offside due to interference by Shavit Mazal during ball control.
  • The committee clarified offside rules when defenders are controlling the ball and attackers interfere.
  • The disallowed goal contributed to Hapoel Petah Tikva's 1-0 loss on August 23, 2026.

In a recent match on August 23, 2026, Hapoel Petah Tikva lost 1-0 to Ironi Tiberias after a late goal by Frank Riboliya was disallowed for offside. The referee, Shnir Levi, did not see the offside in real time but ruled the goal out following advice from the video assistant referee (VAR) team. However, the VAR system's video feed was not functioning during the incident.

The professional committee later reviewed the disallowed goal and justified the intervention, stating that Shavit Mazal was in an offside position and interfered with play immediately, having played the ball during the sequence leading to the goal. The committee emphasized that if a defending player or goalkeeper is in the process of controlling the ball, even if they have touched it but not yet fully controlled it, an attacking player arriving from an offside position who interferes with the opponent will be penalized for offside.

This clarification explains why the goal was disallowed despite the VAR system's technical failure, highlighting the rules regarding offside interference during ball control. The incident occurred late in the match, at the 86th minute, and was a decisive moment in the game.

MakoCentre · Neve Ilan

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

SportsTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire